PATNA, India, May 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on May 1: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a ... Read More
PATNA, India, May 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on May 1: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this applicati... Read More
PATNA, India, May 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on May 1: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this applicati... Read More
PATNA, India, May 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on May 1: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this applicati... Read More
PATNA, India, May 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on May 1: Heard the parties. 2. Mr. Ajay Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that deceased was father-in-law of t... Read More
PATNA, India, May 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on May 1: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in ... Read More
PATNA, India, May 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on May 1: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and complainant/opposite party no. 2. 2. The petitioner apprehends his a... Read More
PATNA, India, May 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on May 1: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this applicati... Read More
PATNA, India, May 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on May 1: Heard Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Ganesh Pasad Singh, learned APP for the St... Read More
PATNA, India, May 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on May 1: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this applicati... Read More